Skip to content

Country

Should Doctors Be Climatologists?

Well, you all know me; I have a HUGE view of human health. Very little falls outside my gaze that impinges on the great joy and vitality that is our lot on earth. So when I read a piece by a doctor demanding that we all learn about “climate change” and that it is our duty to be informed about something that is damaging and already upon us (“Climate change,” she says, “Is here and undeniable”), I get more than a bit pissy!

This is not the territory doctors should be in. Too much politics and flaky science.

The current climate debate is BUNK. There is no global warming. It has been manufactured by NASA tweaking its figures successively, to maintain the apparency of a rise. How can you “adjust” temperature figures?1

But even NASA has been unable to keep up its lies and the temperature rise, if there ever was any, has now been stalled for 10 years. Little wonder Japanese climate scientist Dr. Mototaka Nakamura recently characterized expert’s global warming data as “untrustworthy” and “falsified”.2

The rate of warming has not met with predictions, which is a serious blow to the notion that global warming is already on us. This mega-failure means that all other predictions probably mean very little too.

Yet the ignorance and hype merchants still keep going on, unable to modify their dialogue in the light of mere facts. Squeaky Greta Thunberg has made herself very rich (or rather her father, who pulls the puppet strings) and has become such a celebrity that millions, no billions, of people around the world believe that it’s all beyond question: human activity is messing up our climate.

It is not. Too bad she’s stirring up trouble among the young. Now we have idiots gluing themselves to the roads, in protest… To Hell with ambulances and other emergencies, say these “concerned” individuals.

I have no problem there is climate change. It happens all the time. It’s happened quite a lot in my lifetime of nearly 80 years. But that’s a local phenomenon and  doesn’t equate to “global” warming.

There is evidence of massive change on a bigger scale. The Sahara desert, from space, shows clearly that water once flowed freely across what is now hot, dry sand!

Does Science Count?

Many thousands of good scientists around the world disagree with global warming, including Nobel Prize-winning physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever who, on resigning from the American Physical Society (APS) in protest, wrote: “In the APS it is OK to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?”

Badly put, but he meant that no-one is allowed to argue or debate the issue. The loonies who want to keep this going insist that “scientific consensus” maintains that global warming is real and wants everyone who thinks or says otherwise marginalized and got rid of.

It’s just the way they discredited, censored and removed anyone who wanted to take issue with the COVID-19 narrative. Those who support the official view have no trustworthy science to back themselves with but they fight furiously to protect their position against anyone who doesn’t buy their story. Faking the figures to hold the status quo is not unusual behavior for these dudes. Protesting the trickery however is now enrolled as an antisocial crime!

Take the polar bears; surely that means there is climate change? Coupled with sad pictures of starving polar bears lost on the shrinking ice, it seems OBVIOUS to the average individual. But nobody reads the actual science. The polar bear population is stable overall, according to real scientists! The “sad” pictures happen every year, when the ice melts, and the bears have to swim for it. As for the famous picture of a “starving” bear that went viral, even National Geographic had to admit it was a con. The bear was very likely aged and sick.3

Data from conservation groups and the government show that the polar bear population, which is supposed to be the poster child for global warming, is NOT declining in numbers. In fact today it is roughly five times what it was in the 1950s and three or four times what it was in the 1970s when polar bears became protected under international treaty (see chart).

Again, not what you read in the media, is it?

The truth is that Arctic ice is back on the increase: 20% more as long ago as 2013. It’s not about the extent of the ice, which varies, but the total quantity of ice and that’s going UP. That’s not what you hear from the media, is it?

Is Man To Blame?

Another sinister aspect to this nonsense is the assertion that humankind is to blame, causing rising CO2 levels because of pollution. Individuals are already being haggled and derided by the mob mentality that says you MUST NOT fly airplanes or drive SUVs.

Let us be quite clear: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT PETROCHEMICAL POLLUTION IS DRIVING GLOBAL WARMING. Setting aside the fact that there is no concrete evidence that there is such a thing as global warming, if there were and carbon dioxide levels are on the rise, that does not mean cause and effect. It’s just not scientific! Otherwise, why not televisions? They give off heat. There are more and more TVs in the world, every day. They correlate. Isn’t it obvious that TVs are the real cause of global warming (don’t write to me, it’s a joke!)

There is no question that humans have caused an increase in atmospheric CO2 levels. However, some scientists dispute CO2 as the chief greenhouse gas, and others have argued that the CO2 effect is already at its maximum, so further rises are inconsequential.

We need science, we need more data, we need debate. Unfortunately, the creeps now in charge do not want debate. It will make them look very stupid indeed.

Global Warming, If It Exists, Will Be Very Destructive

You are probably well-conditioned to the fact that it’s a given: global warming is the road to apocalyptic disaster.

It might surprise you to know that this is very far from a given. Many people have bought into the belief that global warming has already resulted in adverse climate change, encouraged by the media, which delights in oxymoronic statements such as: “This is the worst (whatever) … since 1922 and is the result of climate change.” Every unusual weather event is automatically ascribed to climate change.

Short-term predictions for events such as the rise in sea level, mass deaths of polar bears, the vanishing of the arctic, the snow on Mt. Kilimanjaro, and the glaciers of Montana, etc., have been woefully inaccurate. Lady Liberty’s feet remain well clear of the Hudson river water!

But what about all the extra wildfires in California and elsewhere, you ask?

The data do not support the idea that calamity is already upon us. A March 2023 Congressional Research Service report states that U.S. wildfires have decreased slightly over the last 30 years.4

Moreover, there could be an immense amount of good to come from global warming. If it were to happen, and most of the ice melt, it would mean much more liveable and arable land and thus greater agricultural yields. Just what our vast expanding population could do with!

And what about the plants? We need our crops to survive. BUT PLANTS FEED ON CARBON DIOXIDE. It’s their food! So more carbon dioxide would be good if it meant more plants. And it does! A study in the journal Nature Climate Change in 2016 showed that a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years—an increase in area to two times the continental United States—largely due to rising levels of atmospheric CO2

Surprisingly (perhaps) the USA has more trees now than 100 years ago

(photo: Good News Network)

According to the website GoTreeQuotes(.com), the planet has more trees now than 100 years ago. In the decades leading to the 1920’s boom, there were an estimated 750 billion trees worldwide in the 1920s. Since then, and with planting for harvest schemes, we now have approximately 3.04 trillion trees in the world.5

The Final Word

Lest you think I am crazy or sliding into dementia, I encourage you to look into this further. Be sure that the fake “science” is being propelled by criminality, selfishness and greed, fuelled by a corrupt media and politicians on the make, who want us all as mindless slaves, easily controlled by “shortages” and “danger”.

That’s why I am on the case! THAT’S not healthy!

I love to repeat Buckie’s clarion call (Buckminster Fuller), that we are all billionaires—it just needs earth’s resources to be re-distributed more fairly, that’s all.

Forget the dire prognostications, at least for now. The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s website lists some 40 catastrophic predictions made over 50 years by climate and allied experts, including ice ages, famine, and population extinction; none materialized. Remember how we would all fry due to the hole in the ozone layer and then dissolve in acid rain?

It didn’t happen. So be not afraid!

To your good health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

SOURCE:

https://www.kevinmd.com/2023/04/uncovering-the-controversial-debate-surrounding-climate-change.html

References:

  1. I had to go back 8 pages in Google, to start getting the real story…  https://notrickszone.com/2019/06/25/adjusted-unadjusted-data-nasa-uses-the-magic-wand-of-fudging-produces-warming-where-there-never-was/
  2. Ibid.
  3. https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-polar-bear-population-is-declining/
  4. https://www.kevinmd.com/2023/04/uncovering-the-controversial-debate-surrounding-climate-change.html
  5. https://www.gotreequotes.com/are-there-more-trees-now-than-100-years-ago/

The post Should Doctors Be Climatologists? appeared first on Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby.

Older Post
Newer Post
Close (esc)

Popup

Use this popup to embed a mailing list sign up form. Alternatively use it as a simple call to action with a link to a product or a page.

Age verification

By clicking enter you are verifying that you are old enough to consume alcohol.

Search

Shopping Cart