Cancer

If two is good four is better; isn’t that the mentality of the orthodox medical profession?  Two aspirins don’t work; well, take four! It’s nonsense, of course. Especially in respect of chemotherapy, which is highly toxic.  Taking one drug is bad enough, taking two is pretty horrible, but there can be virtually no logical foundation for giving a patient three or four chemo drugs simultaneously.  Of course the shaky theory is that by tackling a tumour using different chemical mechanisms, we can get a better result. But that ignores the adding together of the toxic aspect of the treatment. It defies all reason that if one toxin comes close to killing the patient, three or four toxic substances are going to be no more deleterious. Yet this approach is exactly what’s been happening in a recent trial conducted in Holland; adding a fourth anti-cancer drug to a three-medication treatment actually makes things worse for people with advanced colorectal cancer.

If two is good four is better; isn’t that the mentality of the orthodox medical profession?  Two aspirins don’t work; well, take four! It’s nonsense, of course. Especially in respect of chemotherapy, which is highly toxic.  Taking one drug is bad enough, taking two is pretty horrible, but there can be virtually no logical foundation for giving a patient three or four chemo drugs simultaneously.  Of course the shaky theory is that by tackling a tumour using different chemical mechanisms, we can get a better result. But that ignores the adding together of the toxic aspect of the treatment. It defies all reason that if one toxin comes close to killing the patient, three or four toxic substances are going to be no more deleterious. Yet this approach is exactly what’s been happening in a recent trial conducted in Holland; adding a fourth anti-cancer drug to a three-medication treatment actually makes things worse for people with advanced colorectal cancer.

After years of attack and hassle,  Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D is finally coming out on top, with a major alternative cancer treatment. He not only didn’t get shot or bankrupted; the FDA have agreed to work with him and his anti-neoplastons therapy! The following is the lightly-edited text of a press release sent out […]

After years of attack and hassle,  Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D is finally coming out on top, with a major alternative cancer treatment. He not only didn’t get shot or bankrupted; the FDA have agreed to work with him and his anti-neoplastons therapy! The following is the lightly-edited text of a press release sent out […] The post Antineoplastons for cancer in the news appeared first on Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby.

Did you know that Iscador (homeopathic preparation of mistletoe) is the most commonly prescribed oncological drug in Germany? Actually, according to the Wikipedia entry, some 60% of all oncological treatments in central Europe include some form of mistletoe. You probably didn’t know that. Any inconvenient truths are suppressed by the US medical mafia and their media allies. They cling here to the feeble obsession that the US way is the “only way” and by inference, therefore the correct way. Of course this has more to do with protecting profits than any subsumed moral or scientific right. But it’s curious, isn’t it, that all humble and inexpensive treatments are “bad”, “unproven” or even “dangerous”! Iscador was originally introduced by German philosopher, educationalist and healer Rudolph Steiner (1861- 1925). Steiner went on to found a whole healing system called anthroposophic medicine—literally “human-loving”. Iscador is actually a lactobacillus-fermented extract of the European mistletoe plant, Viscum album and is available here in the USA, by prescription, as the drug Iscar. None of what is written here applies to the American mistletoe, Phoradendron serotinum (we just don’t know).

Did you know that Iscador (homeopathic preparation of mistletoe) is the most commonly prescribed oncological drug in Germany? Actually, according to the Wikipedia entry, some 60% of all oncological treatments in central Europe include some form of mistletoe. You probably didn’t know that. Any inconvenient truths are suppressed by the US medical mafia and their media allies. They cling here to the feeble obsession that the US way is the “only way” and by inference, therefore the correct way. Of course this has more to do with protecting profits than any subsumed moral or scientific right. But it’s curious, isn’t it, that all humble and inexpensive treatments are “bad”, “unproven” or even “dangerous”! Iscador was originally introduced by German philosopher, educationalist and healer Rudolph Steiner (1861- 1925). Steiner went on to found a whole healing system called anthroposophic medicine—literally “human-loving”. Iscador is actually a lactobacillus-fermented extract of the European mistletoe plant, Viscum album and is available here in the USA, by prescription, as the drug Iscar. None of what is written here applies to the American mistletoe, Phoradendron serotinum (we just don’t know).

You may have heard that taking antioxidants while undergoing chemo and radiation will harm your survival. So the majority of oncologists claim. It’s all cut and dried; there is scientific “proof” (they say). Rot. Let me tell you what all this is based on.

You may have heard that taking antioxidants while undergoing chemo and radiation will harm your survival. So the majority of oncologists claim. It’s all cut and dried; there is scientific “proof” (they say). Rot. Let me tell you what all this is based on.

Quackwatch continues to lie about and harass anyone who dares step outside the box. The attacks are crude and malicious, mostly based on bogus scientific credibility. Generally anything safe, gentle and holistic is lambasted as if it were the most deadly toxic intervention, that only a murderous psychopath would even contemplate, while at the same time conveniently side-stepping the irksome truth that the “proper” medicine they are defending routinely kills over 220,000 patients a year in the US alone (and I mean KILLED by blunders and toxicity problems). However, there was a valid note of caution about the use of Insulin Potentiated Therapy for cancer (IPT). It’s true there are no real scientific studies to back up claims being made….

Quackwatch continues to lie about and harass anyone who dares step outside the box. The attacks are crude and malicious, mostly based on bogus scientific credibility. Generally anything safe, gentle and holistic is lambasted as if it were the most deadly toxic intervention, that only a murderous psychopath would even contemplate, while at the same time conveniently side-stepping the irksome truth that the “proper” medicine they are defending routinely kills over 220,000 patients a year in the US alone (and I mean KILLED by blunders and toxicity problems). However, there was a valid note of caution about the use of Insulin Potentiated Therapy for cancer (IPT). It’s true there are no real scientific studies to back up claims being made….

The fact is clear that in primitive societies, people don’t die of cancer. This is supposed to be because they are healthier and eat properly. But who dares think the unthinkable: that the cause of the problem is doctors and when you don’t have them, cancer is insignificant? It’s only when doctors using Western methods get involved that cancer actually becomes a problem at all. Then it’s suddenly a serious and probably fatal condition. But it may be time for a re-think. Yesterday a major study was published which could change EVERYTHING doctors know and think about cancer.

The fact is clear that in primitive societies, people don’t die of cancer. This is supposed to be because they are healthier and eat properly. But who dares think the unthinkable: that the cause of the problem is doctors and when you don’t have them, cancer is insignificant? It’s only when doctors using Western methods get involved that cancer actually becomes a problem at all. Then it’s suddenly a serious and probably fatal condition. But it may be time for a re-think. Yesterday a major study was published which could change EVERYTHING doctors know and think about cancer.