Cancer

Important New Cancer-Fighting Tool: “Ben’s Game” and an inspiring story of selfless giving! I first published this short article several years ago. I’ve brought it out because I don’t think it should be forgotten! Ben Duskin, nine years old, is in remission from Leukemia. Throughout his course of treatment, Ben played computer games and began to […]

Important New Cancer-Fighting Tool: “Ben’s Game” and an inspiring story of selfless giving! I first published this short article several years ago. I’ve brought it out because I don’t think it should be forgotten! Ben Duskin, nine years old, is in remission from Leukemia. Throughout his course of treatment, Ben played computer games and began to […] The post Ben’s cancer fighting game appeared first on Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby.

Cancer Tourism This is a joke from one of my correspondents, Carmi Hazen (aka. Mike). It applies more to US citizens, who have little chance of a cure or therapy here, due to restrictive practises. They are driven to go overseas. But Mike also sent me a video he supposed I would like. Actually, I didn’t. It was one of those phoney con-job videos, claiming that Gerson therapy was THE cure for cancer. There was mushy background music, supposed to transport you to paradise, while they pumped you full of propaganda, which you then accepted without question. What followed was a slightly unseemly correspondence. Mike thought I was just ignorant and lacking medical insight. I thought he was gullible and lacked any kind of scientific objectivity. What annoys me is that the failures of a method are never mentioned in these propaganda type movies. It’s the same with the Hulda Clark cult: you’d think she helped everyone who ever went to her clinic! No mention of the deaths and failures, or the people who walked out, due to disgusting unsanitary conditions. I can state categorically she has harmed more than helped, just by virtue of the stupid false science she promoted (cancer is not caused by just one chemical nor a parasite that isn’t even found in the Western world — except by her, of course, she finds it on everyone!) Yet all you ever hear about are her successes, “proving” she was right. Do NOT write and tell me that it worked for you. I’m glad. But that’s not science. Remember I told you in my writings before: if you just do NOTHING, some people will get rid of their cancer. You have to do better than average, placebo or just natural recovery. Dozens, hundreds or even thousands of recoveries do not prove you have any degree of success, if you don’t break through the average figures].

Cancer Tourism This is a joke from one of my correspondents, Carmi Hazen (aka. Mike). It applies more to US citizens, who have little chance of a cure or therapy here, due to restrictive practises. They are driven to go overseas. But Mike also sent me a video he supposed I would like. Actually, I didn’t. It was one of those phoney con-job videos, claiming that Gerson therapy was THE cure for cancer. There was mushy background music, supposed to transport you to paradise, while they pumped you full of propaganda, which you then accepted without question. What followed was a slightly unseemly correspondence. Mike thought I was just ignorant and lacking medical insight. I thought he was gullible and lacked any kind of scientific objectivity. What annoys me is that the failures of a method are never mentioned in these propaganda type movies. It’s the same with the Hulda Clark cult: you’d think she helped everyone who ever went to her clinic! No mention of the deaths and failures, or the people who walked out, due to disgusting unsanitary conditions. I can state categorically she has harmed more than helped, just by virtue of the stupid false science she promoted (cancer is not caused by just one chemical nor a parasite that isn’t even found in the Western world — except by her, of course, she finds it on everyone!) Yet all you ever hear about are her successes, “proving” she was right. Do NOT write and tell me that it worked for you. I’m glad. But that’s not science. Remember I told you in my writings before: if you just do NOTHING, some people will get rid of their cancer. You have to do better than average, placebo or just natural recovery. Dozens, hundreds or even thousands of recoveries do not prove you have any degree of success, if you don’t break through the average figures].

What’s worse than being you’ve got cancer and you are at risk? Well, possibly being TOLD YOU’VE GOT CANCER WHEN YOU HAVEN’T. That also puts you at appalling risk. You’ll be given deadly chemo, which can wipe out the immune system, throw up, diarrhea, lose your hair… and it was all unnecessary. Just a bit of fast fraud by the oncologist. Now they are calling it “overdiagnosis” of cancer. I don’t mince words: I call it crime. I have reported several times in my newsletter and blogs that I have discovered cases of fraudulent diagnosis of cancer.

What’s worse than being you’ve got cancer and you are at risk? Well, possibly being TOLD YOU’VE GOT CANCER WHEN YOU HAVEN’T. That also puts you at appalling risk. You’ll be given deadly chemo, which can wipe out the immune system, throw up, diarrhea, lose your hair… and it was all unnecessary. Just a bit of fast fraud by the oncologist. Now they are calling it “overdiagnosis” of cancer. I don’t mince words: I call it crime. I have reported several times in my newsletter and blogs that I have discovered cases of fraudulent diagnosis of cancer.

It’s me that used the word catastrophe here; most doctors are talking of a minor glitch. But then most doctors and scientists are gullible or frauds. The fact that 100 scientific papers and 11 US patents are invalidated by the discovery that trials were done on the wrong type of cells is very major indeed. Know what’s weird here? Hardly anybody is concerned. Doesn’t that say volumes for the fact that they don’t believe their own B*S* anyway? I think it does. If you had the “latest drug” for pancreatic cancer, that was “proven” to work, but in fact had been tested only on lung cells or ovarian cancer, wouldn’t you worry… just a little? Well, that’s what patients are now facing.

It’s me that used the word catastrophe here; most doctors are talking of a minor glitch. But then most doctors and scientists are gullible or frauds. The fact that 100 scientific papers and 11 US patents are invalidated by the discovery that trials were done on the wrong type of cells is very major indeed. Know what’s weird here? Hardly anybody is concerned. Doesn’t that say volumes for the fact that they don’t believe their own B*S* anyway? I think it does. If you had the “latest drug” for pancreatic cancer, that was “proven” to work, but in fact had been tested only on lung cells or ovarian cancer, wouldn’t you worry… just a little? Well, that’s what patients are now facing.

A lot of my subscribers will be too young to remember the mass chest X-ray days of the 50s and 60s, when a truck would turn up at the office or school with mobile equipment and take x-rays of everyone. Screening for TB and lung cancer. Good idea, what? Well, no. What actually happened was that these x-ray screening programs CAUSED more cancers than they “detected”. Those who had been screened had a far higher rate of cancers; so much so that mass x-ray screening was dropped. The same thing has happened with mammograms but the entrenched doctors of the cancer industry are not letting on. The truth is already out there, showing mammograms cause more than they “detect”, but they won’t admit it and stop killing women for profit. Now the latest shock: CAT scans are pretty dangerous and nobody has been paying enough attention. Not until Rebecca Smith-Bindman MD did some poking around.

A lot of my subscribers will be too young to remember the mass chest X-ray days of the 50s and 60s, when a truck would turn up at the office or school with mobile equipment and take x-rays of everyone. Screening for TB and lung cancer. Good idea, what? Well, no. What actually happened was that these x-ray screening programs CAUSED more cancers than they “detected”. Those who had been screened had a far higher rate of cancers; so much so that mass x-ray screening was dropped. The same thing has happened with mammograms but the entrenched doctors of the cancer industry are not letting on. The truth is already out there, showing mammograms cause more than they “detect”, but they won’t admit it and stop killing women for profit. Now the latest shock: CAT scans are pretty dangerous and nobody has been paying enough attention. Not until Rebecca Smith-Bindman MD did some poking around.

The American Cancer Society says it is not currently rethinking its stance on cancer screening, as was widely reported last week. Nor do they intend to restate their guidelines to emphasize the inadequacies of screening. It remains a sales hype document for a totally discredited procedure which Prof. Sam Epstein MD has condemned as “a crime against humanity”.

The American Cancer Society says it is not currently rethinking its stance on cancer screening, as was widely reported last week. Nor do they intend to restate their guidelines to emphasize the inadequacies of screening. It remains a sales hype document for a totally discredited procedure which Prof. Sam Epstein MD has condemned as “a crime against humanity”.